The National Forensic DNA Database of South Africa (NFDD) is a national DNA database used in law enforcement in South Africa. The Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act No. 37 of 2013 (the “DNA Act”) provides for the expansion and administration of such a database in South Africa, enabling the South African Police Service (SAPS) to match forensic DNA profiles derived from samples collected at crime scenes with forensic DNA profiles of offenders convicted of, and suspects arrested for, offences listed in a new Schedule 8 of the amended Criminal Procedure Act of 1977.


Before the DNA Act: DCID

DNA profiling has been used in South African law enforcement since 1998, albeit without a legal framework prior to the commencement of the DNA Act.[1][2][3] The DNA Criminal Intelligence Database (DCID) was developed by SAPS and is administered by the Biology Unit of the SAPS Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL).[4][5] The repository of DNA Profiles held by the FSL prior to the commencement of the DNA Act comprises two indices, namely a Casework Index containing forensic DNA profiles derived from biological samples collected from crime scenes and a Reference Index containing forensic DNA profiles of known people, including victims, suspects, volunteers and personnel.[2][6][7] The Criminal Procedure Act of 1977 currently prevents DNA samples from being taken from convicted offenders.[8][9] The DNA profiles in the DCID are generated by analysing an AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus STR multiplex system of 9 different STR loci (D3S1358, vWA, FGA, D8S1179, D21S11, D18S51, D5S818, D13S317 and D7S820) plus Amelogenin for sex determination.[10][11] There were approximately 80,000 DNA profiles on the DCID in 2007,[8] with the number increasing to approximately 180,000 by late 2013.[2]


DNA should be the first thing any detective thinks about. There is always a possibility that the suspect has been injured, that urine and spit could be at the scene. It’s vital to secure that evidence. The first thing I would do is cordon off a crime scene and get forensics in. Nobody must be allowed onto that crime scene. It is better than fingerprints. With DNA, there is no doubt. I believe this bill is fantastic. They must have the DNA profile of every person who has been arrested. This could have prevented more people from being murdered.
Former high profile SAPS investigator Piet Byleveld[12]
The Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act No. 37 of 2013 (the “DNA Act”) provides for the expansion, regulation and administration of a national DNA database known as the National Forensic DNA Database of South Africa (NFDD).[2][13][14] The initial Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Bill drafted in 2008 was tabled in Parliament in 2009 and subsequently split into two separate bills.[1][13][15] The Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Bill [B2–2009], dealing with fingerprints and other body-prints, was assented to in 2010 and came into effect on 18 January 2013.[16] A separate bill unofficially known as the “DNA Bill” was re-introduced to Parliament in May 2013.[17][18][19] It addresses various concerns that arose regarding the initial bill, including those relating to human rights issues.[1][6][15][20] The final version of the DNA Bill, namely the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Bill [B9D–2013], was passed by the National Assembly on 12 November 2013,[21] and was assented to by President Jacob Zuma on 23 January 2014.[22] The commencement date of the DNA Act is 31 January 2015.[7][23][24] The DNA Act provides inter alia for:[2][7]
  • the amendment of the South African Police Service Act of 1995 to facilitate the establishment and regulation of the NFDD
  • the taking of specified bodily samples from certain categories of persons for the purposes of forensic DNA analysis
  • the conditions under which the samples or forensic DNA profiles derived from the samples may be retained or the periods within which they must be destroyed
  • the use of forensic DNA profiles in the investigation of crime and the use of such profiles in proving the innocence or guilt of persons before or during a prosecution or the exoneration of convicted persons
  • assistance in the identification of missing persons and unidentified human remains.
The NFDD comprises six indices containing forensic DNA profiles, namely a Crime Scene Index, an Arrestee Index, a Convicted Offender (CO) index, an Investigative Index, an Elimination Index and a Missing Persons and Unidentified Human Remains Index. Mandatory DNA sampling applies to persons convicted of, and persons arrested for, offences listed in a new Schedule 8 of the amended Criminal Procedure Act of 1977. The offences listed in Schedule 8 may be amended after the initial implementation phase which takes into account capacity constraints.[2][7][25] The DNA profiles in the NFDD are generated by analysing 15 different STR loci plus Amelogenin for sex determination.[11][26] Different retention frameworks apply to each the six different indices. The Crime Scene Index contains forensic DNA profiles obtained from all crime scene samples (biological evidence collected from crime scenes) which will be held on the NFDD indefinitely. The Arrestee Index and Convicted Offender Index contains forensic DNA profiles of all persons arrested or convicted, as the case may be, of a Schedule 8 offence which range from rape and murder to burglary. Forensic DNA Profiles entered into the Arrestee Index will either be migrated to the Convicted Offender Index upon conviction, where they will be held indefinitely, or removed within three years if the arrest does not result in a conviction. Forensic DNA profiles obtained from volunteers with informed consent will be held under the Investigative Index and will be removed from the NFDD within 3 months of the case being finalised.[7] The repository of DNA profiles held by the state FSL is expected to be transferred to the NFDD within 3 months of the DNA database system solution being operational.[7] The FSL is currently investigating implementing the CODIS system solution, which is the open source software developed by the FBI to run criminal justice DNA databases.[27] The DNA Act is subject to a five-year implementation plan which takes into account new training and equipment requirements.[28][29]

DNA Project

When the Bill is actually promulgated, only then will I breathe a transitory sigh of relief, because that will be when the real work begins. While the law may look good on paper, my mission is and has always been to see it translate into actual crime deterrence and reduction. Only when I see its effective implementation will I honestly say that we, as a team, have made a difference.
Vanessa Lynch, founder and executive director of the DNA Project[2]
As in Brazil, families of crime victims in South Africa have successfully campaigned for the establishment of a national forensic DNA database.[30][31][32] The DNA Project, a non-profit organisation, is an advocacy initiative founded by attorney Vanessa Lynch following the unsolved murder of Lynch’s father, John Lynch, in 2004.[2][8][32] The DNA Project advocates the establishment and expansion of a national forensic DNA database and hence earlier identification of criminal suspects.[8][9][33] It has campaigned for the passing of the DNA Bill,[2] donated laboratory equipment to the FSL,[34] funded the UK Forensic Science Service’s diagnostic review of South Africa’s FSL,[34] initiated DNA forensic awareness training programs,[35] and developed a post-graduate forensic analyst qualification.[36][37]

See also


  1. ^ a b c “Information regarding the latest DNA Bill”. Forensic DNA Consultants. Archived from the original on 22 November 2013. Retrieved 22 November 2013.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Venter, Irma (25 October 2013). “Will enlarged DNA database help police in crime fight?”. Engineering News (Creamer Media). Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  3. ^ Lynch, Vanessa (4 September 2013). “DNA bill will make it hard for criminals to hide”. Cape Argus. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  4. ^ “SAPS FAQ: About the Forensic Science Laboratory”. SAPS. Retrieved 17 March 2013.
  5. ^ de Wet, S; Oosthuizen, H; Visser, J (2011). “DNA profiling and the law in South Africa”.PER 14 (4): 171–207. doi:10.4314/pelj.v14i4.6. Retrieved 19 November 2013.
  6. ^ a b Venter, Irma (12 June 2012). “Wednesday is crunch time for DNA database”. Engineering News (Creamer Media). Retrieved 19 March 2013.
  7. ^ a b c d e f “Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act [No. 37 of 2013]” (PDF). Department of Justice. Retrieved 1 January 2015.
  8. ^ a b c d “Carte Blanche: Forensics”. M-Net. 2 September 2007.
  9. ^ a b Seale, Lebogang (12 June 2012). “barring easy escape”. The Star. Retrieved 16 March2013.
  10. ^ Meintjes-van der Walt, Lirieka (2008). “An overview of the use of DNA evidence in South African criminal courts”. South African Journal of Criminal Justice 21 (1): 22–62. Retrieved 19 November 2013.
  11. ^ a b Hancock, Carolyn. “No need to question the validity of DNA evidence”. DNA Project. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  12. ^ Serrao, Angelique (13 November 2013). “DNA bill a huge help, says ex-top cop”. The Star. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  13. ^ a b “South Africa: the current situation”. DNA Project.
  14. ^ “A New DNA Bill”. DNA Project. Retrieved 17 April 2013.
  15. ^ a b Meintjes-van der Walt, Lirieka (2011). “A South African Intelligence DNA Database: panacea or panopticon?”. South African Journal on Human Rights 27 (3): 496–521. Retrieved21 November 2013.
  16. ^ “Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment”. SabinetLaw. Retrieved 20 November2013.
  17. ^ “Statement on the Cabinet meeting of 17 April”. GCIS. 19 April 2013. Retrieved 20 April2013. Cabinet approved the introduction of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Bill to Parliament. This Bill paves the way to regulate and promote the use of DNA in combating crime, taking into account constitutional requirements. The use of DNA evidence holds the potential to alleviate blockages in the criminal justice system. Maximising the use of DNA evidence promotes fairness, confidence, and certainty in the administration of our laws.
  18. ^ “General Notice 435 of 2013” (PDF). Government Gazette 574 (36415). 26 April 2013. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  19. ^ “DNA Bill Tabled in Parliament”. SabinetLaw. 9 May 2013. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  20. ^ Presence, Chantall (31 July 2013). “Passing of DNA Bill closer”. IOL. Retrieved 1 August2013.
  21. ^ “Announcements, Tablings and Committee Reports – Tuesday, 12 November 2013” (PDF). Parliament of South Africa. Retrieved 20 November 2013. Bills passed by Houses – to be submitted to President for assent – (1) Bills passed by National Assembly on 12 November 2013: (c) Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Bill [B 9D – 2013] (National Assembly – sec 75)
  22. ^ Venter, Irma (30 January 2014). “DNA Act passed, mandatory DNA collection for serious crimes on the cards”. Engineering News. Retrieved 31 January 2014.
  23. ^ “Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment 2013”. SabinetLaw. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  24. ^ “Proclamation No. 89, 2014 – Commencement of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act, 2013 (Act No. 37 of 2013)”. Government Gazette (38376). 30 December 2014. Under section 9 of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act, 2013 (Act No. 37 of 2013), I hereby fix 31 January 2015 as the date on which the said Act will come into operation with the exception of section 2 (to the extent that it inserts section 36D(1) in the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977)).
  25. ^ Hartley, Wyndham (1 August 2013). “ANC says costs can be cut for new DNA database”.Business Day. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  26. ^ Heathfield, LJ (2014). “Policy required for entry of DNA profiles onto the National Forensic DNA Database of South Africa”. S Afr J Sci. 110 (7/8): 0374. doi:10.1590/sajs.2014/20130374.
  27. ^ Williams, Denise (25 July 2013). “Clueless police top brass sent packing”. The Times. Retrieved 27 November 2013. The choice of software for the envisaged system was questioned. It has yet to be decided whether the FBI’s Codis or the ‘home-grown’ Solve would be used.
  28. ^ Legg, Kieran (30 January 2014). “DNA Act to keep tabs on crooks”. Cape Argus. Retrieved19 February 2014.
  29. ^ “DNA Bill robust – Phiyega”. eNCA. 18 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  30. ^ DNASaves (29 May 2012). “New DNA law will make Brazil safer and save lives” (Press release). Retrieved 27 November 2013.
  31. ^ Radebe, Hopewell (10 July 2013). “Plan to establish national DNA database”. Business Day. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  32. ^ a b Groenewald, Yolandi (18 August 2013). “Ten years later, success for driving force behind DNA bill”. City Press. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  33. ^ Rose-Innes, Olivia (21 June 2011). “SA’s wasted crime-fighter: DNA”. Health24. Retrieved17 March 2013.
  34. ^ a b Barber, Bliss (29 November 2007). “DNA equipment donation boosts fight against crime”(PDF). Cape Times. Retrieved 17 March 2013.
  35. ^ “DNA Bill set for adoption in two weeks”. SABC News. 5 March 2013. Retrieved 17 April2013.
  36. ^ “Postgraduate qualification in forensic DNA analysis”. DNA Project. Retrieved 23 November2013.
  37. ^ “DNA Project – South Africa: Past projects”. DNA Project. Retrieved 17 March 2013.

External links

  • DNA Project – South Africa

Pin It on Pinterest